Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 12 of 58 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Correction to: Public goods and procreation.

Monash bioethics review

Anomaly J.
PMID: 31062293
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct;37(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00092-y.

The article Public goods and procreation, written by Jonathan Anomaly, was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 10 December 2014 without open access.

Cite
Anomaly J. Correction to: Public goods and procreation. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019;37(1):79doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00092-y.
Anomaly, J. (2019). Correction to: Public goods and procreation. Monash bioethics review, 37(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-019-00092-y
Anomaly, Jonathan. "Correction to: Public goods and procreation." Monash bioethics review vol. 37,1 (2019): 79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-019-00092-y
Anomaly J. Correction to: Public goods and procreation. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct;37(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00092-y. PMID: 31062293.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Editorial.

Monash bioethics review

Oakley J.
PMID: 34913157
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):141-142. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

No abstract available.

Cite
Oakley J. Editorial. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;39(2):141-142doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2.
Oakley, J. (2021). Editorial. Monash bioethics review, 39(2), 141-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2
Oakley, Justin. "Editorial." Monash bioethics review vol. 39,2 (2021): 141-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2
Oakley J. Editorial. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):141-142. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2. Epub 2021 Dec 15. PMID: 34913157.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Children as voices and images for medicinal cannabis law reform.

Monash bioethics review

Freckelton Ao Qc I.
PMID: 34719005
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct 31; doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00139-z. Epub 2021 Oct 31.

This article situates the movement for the legalisation of medicinal cannabis within the bigger picture of the impetus toward recreational cannabis legalisation. It describes the role played by children with epileptic syndromes in the medicinal cannabis law reform campaigns...

Cite
Freckelton Ao Qc I. Children as voices and images for medicinal cannabis law reform. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00139-z.
Freckelton Ao Qc, I. (2021). Children as voices and images for medicinal cannabis law reform. Monash bioethics review, . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00139-z
Freckelton Ao Qc, Ian. "Children as voices and images for medicinal cannabis law reform." Monash bioethics review vol. (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00139-z
Freckelton Ao Qc I. Children as voices and images for medicinal cannabis law reform. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct 31; doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00139-z. Epub 2021 Oct 31. PMID: 34719005; PMCID: PMC8557259.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues.

Monash bioethics review

Gyngell C, Lynch F, Stark Z, Vears D.
PMID: 34971444
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Dec;39:117-129. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

Although rapid genomic sequencing (RGS) is improving care for critically ill children with rare disease, it also raises important ethical questions that need to be explored as its use becomes more widespread. Two such questions relate to the degree...

Cite
Gyngell C, Lynch F, Stark Z, et al. Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;39:117-129doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0.
Gyngell, C., Lynch, F., Stark, Z., & Vears, D. (2021). Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues. Monash bioethics review, 39117-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0
Gyngell, Christopher, et al. "Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues." Monash bioethics review vol. 39 (2021): 117-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0
Gyngell C, Lynch F, Stark Z, Vears D. Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Dec;39:117-129. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0. Epub 2021 Dec 31. PMID: 34971444.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020.

Monash bioethics review

Petersen N, Perry J.
PMID: 34495499
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Sep 08; doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3. Epub 2021 Sep 08.

Given the lack of effective curative treatment options and in light of a significant reconceptualization of Alzheimer's disease, the focus of dementia research has shifted towards prevention, risk prediction, and detection in very early disease stages. In the context...

Cite
Petersen N, Perry J. Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3.
Petersen, N., & Perry, J. (2021). Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020. Monash bioethics review, . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3
Petersen, Niklas, and Perry, Julia. "Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020." Monash bioethics review vol. (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3
Petersen N, Perry J. Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Sep 08; doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3. Epub 2021 Sep 08. PMID: 34495499.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Eugenics offended.

Monash bioethics review

Wilson RA.
PMID: 34913155
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00145-1. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

This commentary continues an exchange on eugenics in Monash Bioethics Review between (Anomaly in Defending Eugenics: From Cryptic Choice to Conscious Selection 35:24-35, 2018), (Wilson in Eugenics Undefended 37:68-75, 2019), and (Veit in Can 'Eugenics' be Defended? 39:60-67, 2021)....

Cite
Wilson RA. Eugenics offended. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;39(2):169-176doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00145-1.
Wilson, R. A. (2021). Eugenics offended. Monash bioethics review, 39(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00145-1
Wilson, Robert A. "Eugenics offended." Monash bioethics review vol. 39,2 (2021): 169-176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00145-1
Wilson RA. Eugenics offended. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00145-1. Epub 2021 Dec 15. PMID: 34913155.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The practitioner as endangered citizen: a genealogy.

Monash bioethics review

Koch T.
PMID: 34913156
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):157-168. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00143-3. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

Medical practice has always involved at least three roles, three complimentary identities. Practitioners have been at once clinicians dedicated to a patient's care, members of a professional organization promoting medicine, and informed citizens engaged in public debates on health...

Cite
Koch T. The practitioner as endangered citizen: a genealogy. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;39(2):157-168doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00143-3.
Koch, T. (2021). The practitioner as endangered citizen: a genealogy. Monash bioethics review, 39(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00143-3
Koch, Tom. "The practitioner as endangered citizen: a genealogy." Monash bioethics review vol. 39,2 (2021): 157-168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00143-3
Koch T. The practitioner as endangered citizen: a genealogy. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):157-168. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00143-3. Epub 2021 Dec 15. PMID: 34913156; PMCID: PMC8674021.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020.

Monash bioethics review

Petersen N, Perry J.
PMID: 34495499
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):180-183. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3. Epub 2021 Sep 08.

Given the lack of effective curative treatment options and in light of a significant reconceptualization of Alzheimer's disease, the focus of dementia research has shifted towards prevention, risk prediction, and detection in very early disease stages. In the context...

Cite
Petersen N, Perry J. Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;39(2):180-183doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3.
Petersen, N., & Perry, J. (2021). Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020. Monash bioethics review, 39(2), 180-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3
Petersen, Niklas, and Perry, Julia. "Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020." Monash bioethics review vol. 39,2 (2021): 180-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3
Petersen N, Perry J. Annette Leibing and Silke Schicktanz (eds): Preventing dementia?: Critical perspectives on a new paradigm of preparing for old age : Berghahn Books, New York / Oxford, 2020. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):180-183. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00135-3. Epub 2021 Sep 08. PMID: 34495499.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Rethinking Health Care Ethics: A response to Professor Reis-Dennis.

Monash bioethics review

Scher S, Kozlowska K.
PMID: 32329032
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2020 May;38(1):87-90. doi: 10.1007/s40592-020-00105-1.

No abstract available.

Cite
Scher S, Kozlowska K. Rethinking Health Care Ethics: A response to Professor Reis-Dennis. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2020;38(1):87-90doi: 10.1007/s40592-020-00105-1.
Scher, S., & Kozlowska, K. (2020). Rethinking Health Care Ethics: A response to Professor Reis-Dennis. Monash bioethics review, 38(1), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-020-00105-1
Scher, Stephen, and Kozlowska, Kasia. "Rethinking Health Care Ethics: A response to Professor Reis-Dennis." Monash bioethics review vol. 38,1 (2020): 87-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-020-00105-1
Scher S, Kozlowska K. Rethinking Health Care Ethics: A response to Professor Reis-Dennis. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2020 May;38(1):87-90. doi: 10.1007/s40592-020-00105-1. PMID: 32329032.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity (M. V. Dougherty).

Monash bioethics review

Sun BZ.
PMID: 31124005
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct;37(1):76-78. doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00093-x.

No abstract available.

Cite
Sun BZ. Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity (M. V. Dougherty). Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019;37(1):76-78doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00093-x.
Sun, B. Z. (2019). Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity (M. V. Dougherty). Monash bioethics review, 37(1), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-019-00093-x
Sun, Bob Z. "Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity (M. V. Dougherty)." Monash bioethics review vol. 37,1 (2019): 76-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-019-00093-x
Sun BZ. Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity (M. V. Dougherty). Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct;37(1):76-78. doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00093-x. PMID: 31124005.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Editorial.

Monash bioethics review

Oakley J.
PMID: 34913157
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):141-142. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

No abstract available.

Cite
Oakley J. Editorial. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;39(2):141-142doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2.
Oakley, J. (2021). Editorial. Monash bioethics review, 39(2), 141-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2
Oakley, Justin. "Editorial." Monash bioethics review vol. 39,2 (2021): 141-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2
Oakley J. Editorial. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):141-142. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00144-2. Epub 2021 Dec 15. PMID: 34913157.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Friendship as a framework for resolving dilemmas in clinical ethics.

Monash bioethics review

Pruski M.
PMID: 34716569
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):143-156. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00141-5. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

Healthcare professionals often need to make clinical decisions that carry profound ethical implications. As such, they require a tool that will make decision-making intuitive. While the discussion about the principles that should guide clinical ethics has been going on...

Cite
Pruski M. Friendship as a framework for resolving dilemmas in clinical ethics. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021;39(2):143-156doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00141-5.
Pruski, M. (2021). Friendship as a framework for resolving dilemmas in clinical ethics. Monash bioethics review, 39(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00141-5
Pruski, Michal. "Friendship as a framework for resolving dilemmas in clinical ethics." Monash bioethics review vol. 39,2 (2021): 143-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00141-5
Pruski M. Friendship as a framework for resolving dilemmas in clinical ethics. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):143-156. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00141-5. Epub 2021 Oct 30. PMID: 34716569.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 12 of 58 entries